Social network on Nuxt 4, MySQL 8 and Better Auth
Social network: public profiles with @-handles, a directed follow graph, an authored-post feed, and per-post like edges.
79 files, 4 tables and 123 lines of schema, verified 2026-08-23 on Nuxt 4, MySQL 8 and Better Auth.
16 pinned upstream versions
request path. session validation runs in server components and route handlers, not at the edge
What you're getting
Nuxt 4 (framework mode): full-stack Vue SSR: client under app/ (Vite), server under server/ (Nitro), API as server/api/*.post.ts Nitro route handlers.
MySQL 8 via Drizzle ORM and the mysql2 driver.
Better Auth: self-hosted auth running inside your app against your Postgres (Drizzle adapter).
Social network: public profiles with @-handles, a directed follow graph, an authored-post feed, and per-post like edges.
Setup
bun add nuxt vue drizzle-orm mysql2 better-authDATABASE_URLMySQL connection string (mysql://…)BETTER_AUTH_SECRETgenerate with `openssl rand -base64 32`BETTER_AUTH_URLyour app's base URLApply the schema with bunx drizzle-kit push
Initialization
Database client
Social network schema: profiles, follow graph, posts & likes
4 tables, 16 columns and 12 indexes and constraints, applied to a live MySQL 8 and asserted to materialize.
profiles6 columns · 4 indexedfollows3 columns · 3 indexedposts4 columns · 2 indexedpost_likes3 columns · 3 indexedWhat this schema is built to answer
profiles.handle is unique and separately covered by idx_profile_handle, so the URL segment is a single-row hit; profiles.user_id is a unique FK to user.id, making the hop between profile and account 1:1 in either direction.
idx_follow_following exists for the reverse direction of the edge: listing or counting everyone whose follows.following_id points at a user, without scanning the follow table.
The follows primary key is (follower_id, following_id), so everyone a viewer follows is a prefix scan of the key itself — no secondary index needed — and each author is then read through idx_post_author on posts.
idx_post_author narrows posts to one author_id. There is no (author_id, created_at) composite, so the newest-first ordering is a sort layered on the index hit rather than a range read.
post_likes is keyed (post_id, user_id): the leading column counts a post's likes, the full key answers the viewer's own like as a point lookup, and idx_post_likes_user inverts it into that user's liked-posts page.
Profiles & handlesone public profile per Better Auth user, with a unique @-handle and optional bio/avatar
Follows: the directed user graphdirected follower→following edges with a composite unique that prevents duplicate follows
Posts & the feedauthored feed posts keyed to a Better Auth user, indexed per-author for profile timeline queries
Post likespost↔user like edges with a composite unique enforcing one like per user per post
Deploy targets
The app UI
Decisions and compatibility
Client/server split: the DB client, Drizzle schema, records, and webhooks are server-side (server/). The `@/` alias is the client root (app/); server code reaches shared modules via Nuxt's `~~` rootDir alias (e.g. `~~/server/db/schema`).
The API layer is Nitro, Nuxt's server engine: endpoints are server/api/*.post.ts route handlers, and auth mounts as a Nitro catch-all that delegates to the auth library's framework-agnostic web handler.
Nuxt auto-imports components and composables at runtime, but the emitted server code imports h3 helpers (defineEventHandler, toWebRequest) EXPLICITLY — the one deliberate idiom trade so the handlers type-check under standalone tsc instead of relying on the auto-import magic.
Session gating runs in a Nitro server middleware (server/middleware/), which fires on every SSR and API request — the true security boundary, and a real server-side session check rather than a cookie-existence peek.
mysql2's pool multiplexes connections; drizzle-orm/mysql2 wraps it. One module-level pool is right for a serverless/edge app — the runtime and the pool handle concurrency.
MySQL has no row-level security: multi-tenant isolation is enforced in application code via the forOrg helper (src/lib/tenant.ts), not by the database. See the tenant-scoping section on SaaS pages.
Self-hosted: Better Auth owns the user/session/account/verification tables. This stack emits them (db/auth-schema.ts) and hands them to the Drizzle adapter, so app-type schemas can foreign-key `user` directly.
Both the follow edge (follower_id + following_id composite PK + unique) and the like edge (post_id + user_id composite PK + unique) carry explicit unique constraints — the constraint is the identity, not just a performance index.
Better Auth's user.id is text, not uuid; all four tables match that type on their FK columns rather than recasting, so joins never cross a type boundary.
MySQL provides no row-level security. On MySQL, multi-tenant isolation is APP-ENFORCED via the forOrg helper (src/lib/tenant.ts), not database-enforced like Postgres RLS. Every org-scoped query MUST go through forOrg — a missed query leaks across tenants. Postgres cells enforce this in the database itself (RLS), so it holds even for a query that forgets to scope.
How this stack fits together
On Nuxt 4 this stack puts its MySQL 8 client at server/lib/db.ts and the Better Auth instance at lib/auth.ts, with the auth route at server/api/auth/[...all].ts and session checks in server/middleware/auth.ts. Those are the paths this framework's adapter actually emits, not a shared convention: the same Social network schema and the same Better Auth wiring land somewhere different on each of the other frameworks in the registry.
Better Auth owns its identity tables in the same database as profiles, follows, posts and post_likes, so the foreign keys reference the local user row directly and a delete cascades through them. No mirror, no webhook, and no window where the two stores disagree.
MySQL 8 stores those surrogate keys as varchar(36), so every foreign key across the 4 tables and 16 columns below is a varchar(36) column. The migration was applied to a live MySQL 8 and the tables asserted, not just type-checked.
Social network
Better Auth's user row is the account; profiles is the face that account shows. The split is deliberate: profiles.user_id is a unique text FK, so the mapping is strictly one-to-one, but posts.author_id, follows.follower_id, follows.following_id and post_likes.user_id all reference user.id rather than profiles.id. Authorship is keyed to the account, while the handle, bio and avatar are a separate row you join in for display. Every one of those FKs cascades on delete, so removing an account clears its profile, both directions of its follow edges, its posts and its likes in a single statement — there is no orphan sweep to write. The graph itself is two edge tables, and both make the edge its own identity.
follows has no surrogate key: (follower_id, following_id) is the primary key, and follows_follower_following_unique restates the same rule. You cannot follow the same account twice, and direction matters — following back inserts a second, separate row. post_likes is shaped identically, with (post_id, user_id) as the composite primary key plus post_likes_post_user_unique. Neither table caches a count; follower totals and like totals are aggregates over the edges themselves. The cost of that shape is worth knowing before you build on it. A home feed is fan-out-on-read: take the follower-side prefix of the follows primary key to get everyone a viewer follows, then read each author through idx_post_author.
posts carries only idx_post_author — no (author_id, created_at) composite and no index on created_at alone — so newest-first ordering is a sort on top of the index hit, which is fine at seed scale and the first thing to revisit under load. Likes read better: (post_id, user_id) leads with post_id, so counting a post's likes and answering whether the current viewer already liked it both ride the same key, and idx_post_likes_user runs the relation backwards for a liked-posts page. handle is unique and separately covered by idx_profile_handle, which is what keeps an /@name route a single-row lookup.
Nuxt 4
Nuxt 4 in framework mode is the one stack here with two roots. Client code lives under app/ and is what `@/` points at (Vite, Vue single-file components); server code lives under server/ and is run by Nitro, Nuxt's server engine. The database layer is server-side, so initCode writes server/lib/db.ts and the schema, record modules and webhooks land under server/db/ and server/api/ — server modules reach each other through Nuxt's `~~` rootDir alias (`~~/server/lib/db`, `~~/server/db/schema`), never through `@/`. That split earns its keep with secrets: the Resend send client belongs to ~~/server/lib/email, and nothing under app/ can import it by accident. The API layer is Nitro rather than a React-shaped route file.
server/api/webhooks/polar.post.ts is a POST endpoint; auth mounts as the catch-all server/api/auth/[...all].ts, which adapts the H3 event with toWebRequest(event) and hands the resulting web Request to the auth library's framework-agnostic handler. Nuxt auto-imports defineEventHandler and its siblings at runtime, but the emitted server files import them from h3 explicitly — one deliberate idiom trade so every handler type-checks under standalone tsc. Session gating is a Nitro server middleware at server/middleware/auth.ts. It fires on every SSR render and every API request, filters on pathname prefixes (/dashboard, /settings), performs the real auth.api.getSession() lookup, and answers with sendRedirect(event, "/sign-in", 302). Because Nitro sits in front of both the rendered page and the endpoints, that is a genuine security boundary rather than a cheap pre-render bounce.
On the client, Vue does its own thing: the auth binding exposes signIn/signUp/useSession as Vue refs, screens are .vue components under app/pages/ (sign-in.vue, dashboard/[id].vue), chrome lives in app/components/ and app/layouts/, and SPA-side guards are app/middleware/*.ts. The design system is shadcn-vue on reka-ui — a real re-port, not the React components wearing new names — and it is checked with vue-tsc, since plain tsc cannot parse an SFC.
MySQL 8
MySQL 8 here is the mysql2 driver under Drizzle's mysql-core dialect: drizzle({ client: pool }) over one module-level mysql.createPool(DATABASE_URL). mysql2's pool multiplexes connections itself, so a single pool per module is the right shape — the runtime and the pool handle concurrency, with no globalThis singleton needed. The framework decides where that file lands (src/lib/db.ts on Next, app/lib/db.ts on React Router, server/lib/db.ts on Nuxt); the client text is the same in all three. The dialect's constraints show up directly in the column types.
MySQL cannot index a TEXT column without a prefix length, so anything that is a primary key, a UNIQUE, an index or a CHECK target is varchar with a declared length: ids are varchar(36) with no database default — the application generates them with crypto.randomUUID(), since there is no uuid type and no defaultRandom() — Better Auth's user.id and every FK pointing at it are varchar(255), an email or slug is varchar(255), a role or status varchar(32), a SHA-256 hex digest varchar(64). Free-form columns nobody indexes stay text. Timestamps are plain timestamp().defaultNow() without the withTimezone flag the Postgres bodies carry, and counters are bigint({ mode: "number" }). The operational difference that matters most: MySQL has no row-level security.
There is no policy layer to fall back on, so multi-tenant isolation is enforced in application code by forOrg(db, orgId) in src/lib/tenant.ts, which wraps each org-owned table's select/update/delete with a where on organization_id and throws on a missing orgId instead of quietly running unscoped. It is a real boundary only while every read and write goes through it — the shared plans catalog sits deliberately outside — and it is app-enforced, not database-enforced. Connections change with the deploy target: connectionLimit 2 per short-lived serverless instance, 10 in a long-running Node process, and on Cloudflare Workers mysql2 cannot run at all — there are no TCP sockets — so the edge client swaps to @planetscale/database over HTTP with drizzle-orm/planetscale-serverless.
Better Auth
Better Auth is a TypeScript library, not a service. The process that serves your pages is the process that hashes passwords and issues sessions, and the session rows sit in the same database as your application data. This fragment authors the four tables Better Auth expects — user, session, account, verification — into db/auth-schema.ts and passes that module to drizzleAdapter(db, { provider, schema: authSchema }) inside lib/auth.ts. Better Auth never creates tables at runtime; its CLI normally generates them, and authoring them here means the identity schema goes through the same migration proof as the app-type tables.
user.id is a bare text primary key (varchar(255) on MySQL, which cannot index TEXT without a prefix length) carrying no database default, because Better Auth generates the id and sends it in the insert. That is precisely what lets an app-type schema foreign-key user.id and cascade on delete. Session validation happens at two different strengths, deliberately. Next's src/proxy.ts calls getSessionCookie(request), which only asks whether the cookie is present: it runs at the edge, touches no database, and exists to bounce logged-out traffic before render. The authoritative check is auth.api.getSession({ headers }), and it runs inside the protected surface — requireUser() in src/lib/session.ts on Next, requireAuth(request) in app/lib/require-auth.ts on React Router, and the Nitro handler at server/middleware/auth.ts on Nuxt.
The last two do the real lookup on every guarded request, since neither framework has an edge proxy to peek with. The remaining emitted files are the mount: toNextJsHandler(auth) behind a [...all] route on Next, a resource route delegating to auth.handler on React Router, an h3 catch-all wrapping toWebRequest on Nuxt, plus a Vue auth client there. The auth instance imports the db client the framework already exported, so both share one pooled connection. What you inherit is ownership. Sessions join to your own tables, a user delete is a foreign-key cascade rather than a sync job, and drift arrives through your lockfile instead of a vendor's release notes.
The same ownership is the cost: password recovery only delivers if an email fragment is composed in — Better Auth's own server returns 400 "Reset password isn't enabled" until emailAndPassword.sendResetPassword is set — and rotating BETTER_AUTH_SECRET is yours to schedule.
